Business Management Skills

The Sales techniques employed by sales personnel work in certain circumstances while they don’t in certain others. George S May, in order to overcome this aspect, has developed a list of 10 effective habits that sales personnel should develop in order to reach greater heights. By inculcating these aspects in them, sales personnel are encouraged to develop their own methods and approaches. Further, emphasis has been laid on the importance of developing better customer relations than concentrating on numbers, while developing this module

Selling is a multi-staged process that starts with a call and ends with closing a deal. However it is very difficult to take a call on when, how and whom to sell, and a lot rests on the skills of the sales personnel. To overcome this uncertainty, sales training program imparts industry specific, tried and tested “sales techniques” which can become a potent tool at the disposal of the salesman. Use of appropriate Sales technique in various stages of the selling process is of immense importance. This aspect of developing sales techniques has been given special importance to in the sales training module.

George S May elaborates this aspect in its training module by providing a framework of 10 effective habits of sales professionals. It also imparts advanced sales techniques including strategies, tactics and ploys, to not only sell but to provide an excellent service

There are various models and thought processes that a business management consultant infuses into an organization. George S May as a leading management consultant has an upper hand in doing this, thanks to having already served more than 500,000 companies till date all across US and Canada. It has provided services to companies categorized under more than 3000 different industry classifications.

Higher Sales figures are usually achieved through wise use of various Sales techniques to augment the process of selling. The sales training module discusses these Sales technique at length, and enumerates as many relevant ones as possible. These sales techniques are designed to be delivered directly to the sales personnel through a series of lecturers. The low price of these modules makes it affordable for the organization to hand a copy to each of its sales personnel. These Sales training modules come with a great degree of flexibility by putting forth various approaches and their pros and cons, rather than some hard and fast rules.

Share This

Like most things during organisation change Plant, Equipment and Tools are subject to change. This is an area that is consistently forgotten during the process of organisation change. When processes change there is often the need to alter the workspace, equipment or tools. If this was a company of actors taking on new play they would handling costumes and set design.

Let’s use the theater comparison a little longer. If the company has been putting on Hamlet and will be performing a musical, their costuming and set design will have to undergo transition. Musicals, with their grander production requirements, often need larger theaters. Period piece costumes appropriate for Shakespeare would be ridiculous for musical comedy. The tools, equipment and plant for the play must transition to make the musical work. It would not take a genius to realize that no theater group, no matter how talented, could make a musical work with Shakespeare props.

How does this apply to organisation change? When transitions occur from old processes to new processes, PET also transitions. Ironically, while actors are not expected to go without PET changes, workers in business settings frequently are expected to do so. Necessary equipment upgrades will go undone. At times businesses will invest in the right equipment, but not in the right facilities for it. It is commonplace in business to expect satisfactory organisation change with conditions that would send actors into a strike. That is astounding because actors are often considered to suffer abuse in their industry. Failing to procure the right equipment and tools can torpedo a change effort.

PET is a four component process. At first, identifying the changes that are needed to equipment, tools, or work spaces is the priority. Will new software be needed? The next step is to put the changes in place and test them. Are the changes working the way they should be? The impacted guidelines and operating controls need to be altered for the new PET. Whenever new equipment is being employed it necessitates the introduction of revised guidelines and new manuals. Who would give someone an MP3 player without the manual? In a work setting, this is the function manuals and guidelines serve. See to it that old guidelines and unnecessary manuals are purged from the workplace. They are useless garbage following PET change. No one keeps manuals for things they don’t own anymore, why should a business?

Plant, equipment and tools are things must be handles as part of organisation change. The required changes may be relatively minor. The things that have to be altered can be epic in proportions. No matter the size, identifying, setting up, and testing the process changes will have to occur. Do the necessary revision work on manuals and guidelines once things are up and running. Why create unnecessary confusion? Get rid of the old manuals and guidelines. It limits the clutter and misinformation

For more information, please see our website: Organisation Change

Share This

A big piece of Engineered Organizational Change or EOC is called the Blueprint. The blueprint deals with two components. The first is vision or . The second is the case for change or To steal from the theater if there were a script for the organization change it would be the blueprint.

Vision is not the best language to employ because it is vague. It has a religious connotation not really appropriate to the business world. In addition, when discussing vision in relation to organization change it is often dealt with as list of generalities. If the vision is displayed as bullet points, it’s probably not going to work as a long-term set of goals. When vision is used in engineered organizational change, it means a complete and specific strategy. Assuming the term is read this way it can work very well with the blueprint..

The case for change is the general argument for why the change should happen. Normally, the benefits the business can expect to enjoy are covered. To say it another way, this is what the corporation gets from the change. Generally it also will cover the benefits individuals can expect from the organization change. The acronym WIIFM, or what’s in it for me, is usually applied to this discussion of individual benefits. They want to know that the change is not just about making executives more money with nothing for them.

There are five parts to the blueprint. It enables the creation and affirmation of goals for change. It enables the creation and affirmation of the case for change. Having created a case for change, the blueprint is also meant to communicate the case for change to everyone involved in the organization change. The use of management work-through sessions to discuss the transition process is a key feature. Naturally, the communication of the impact the organization change will have on workers needs to be handled.

The blueprint should be both very clear and have specificity. Vision should be discussed, as well as the case for change. It should also effectively handle change objectives, communicate the case for change, encourage management work-through sessions, and communicate the projected impacts to individuals as a result of the organization change. The process of transition can be more expertly accomplished by employing a well developed blueprint.

For more information, please see our website: Organization Change

Share This

Corporations depend on those in middle management a great deal. The effectiveness of most corporate entities rests in the hands of middle managers. They represent the connection between the upper reaches of the organization and the rank and file. The keep the business moving along day to day. Middle managers act to stabilize the work environment for the organization. They enable employees to be focused on the job. This is their traditional role. Middle managers are also key to successful organisation change.

They are the means through which organisation change plans move from change planning teams down to supervisors and workers. That being said, they will interpret change efforts through the lens of running the business. When change plans are presented, many middle managers are leery of them. Something you could expect to hear from a middle manager would be, “Look at all the risks we run…” This attitude is created by their run the business mentality and not as intentional bottlenecking of the plan.

Organisation change is probably going to involve middle management; as such, their input on change can only serve to ease the transition on implementation. They have more hands-on insight about how the work is actually happening. They are the most credible source for other middle managers when it comes to change. Like it or not, for the people most affected by change, if you wear a suit every day, you have no business changing procedures. Middle management participation will limit some of the innate disdain that frontline supervisors and employees have for what they perceive to be as people who get a paycheck for inventing changes to justify their jobs.

It is a must to choose people from middle management that have genuine credibility to participate in the planning. They can serve as subject matter experts. They can comment about every benefit to the process as it exists presently. They can assist with change design. Implementation design is another area where middle managers can of help. They will have insight into how fast a change can be implemented effectively.

Going through change steps can assist in procuring support from middle managers for change initiatives. This method enables reasonable discussion regarding the initiative. When organisation change is pushed onto middle managers, there’s a tendency for them to have split-second, irrational responses. The idea is to get them to participate in a data-based analysis of the initiative.

By honoring and offering respect for the job of the middle manager, it helps to forestall resistance. The chaos that change causes in the work environment is the very thing that middle managers are trained to keep from occurring; their reluctance toward change is understandable. Their jobs are to keep things running smoothly and change is disruptive. By being cognizant of the difficult position change puts them in and respecting the problems, middle management will be more receptive to organisation change.

For more information, please see our website: Organisation Change

Share This

One of the pieces of engineered organizational change is Planning. Without planning no sought after corporate change is ever going to come off well. Not having a plan for change is like not having scheduled rehearsals for a new stage production. No one will show up, the lines won’t be learned, and the play will fail. Change efforts are subject to the same outcomes when planning is neglected.

Sticking with the metaphor, how will things turn out if the actors aren’t told what roles they have? What if they did not know which rehearsals they needed to attend? It would end in misery. For situations of corporate change, this would be like holding meetings but keeping the location secret? Or, announcing meetings but refusing to answer the question of who needs to be there. How would anyone realize they needed to attend? Would they accomplish any goals? Would anything happen on schedule? Naturally, none of that would come to pass.

No matter the degree of secrecy regarding the initiative, corporate change still demands disclosure to the relevant employees. Sooner or later, cards have to be put on the table. Beyond a certain point, it becomes counter-productive to keep people in the dark. To do a job, employees need to know the job is there to be done. What this amounts to is that in planning certain conditions have to met. To be completed satisfactorily, there are four major components to be dealt with in planning.

The creation of a master implementation schedule is an absolute must for effective change. Moreover, it must be communicated to those expected to carry it out. There is no substitute for an employee that knows what is happening. When implementation assignments are being distributed, face-to-face meetings are the best. This could translate to a lot of foot travel between offices, but in a crunch meeting with limited attendance can be almost as effective. The whole idea is make sure that goals are clearly communicated to the people who have to go make them happen. Schedule meetings on a regular basis. These can be a chance to evaluate progress or analyze a lack thereof. Finally, when there is success, celebrate it. Affirming success, particularly when corporate change is afoot, can keep people focused on the purpose and solidify team spirit.

Planning is a core piece of a satisfactory corporate change. The use of planning is much like the use of rehearsal schedules for theater companies. It keeps the focus on the goals that need to be achieved and when they need to be achieved. It is best achieved through a master implementation schedule, individual implementation assignments, and regular meetings for project review. When goals are met, make it a reason to celebrate. Corporate change can happen on schedule with judicious planning.

For more information, please see our website: Corporate Change

Share This

Establishing forums can be an outstanding way for a business to facilitate Business Change Management. Forums represent a chance for executive teams to consider, evaluate, and plan a course of action as a unit. Forums specifically created to handle run the business side of things are a stock component of most successful businesses. Management decision makers get together, consider the movement made on projects, check numbers and chart out a plan. It might entail as little as sticking to the original schedule or it might mean revamping the show.

Unfortunately,when changing the business does make it into a forum discussion, it is often included in a running the business forum. Typically, change the business receives no talk time and present business dominates. Business Change Management forums more often occur during retreat meetings where the work is mixed together with play. While there is nothing inherently wrong with retreat meetings, it is an informal setting that can imply that changing the business is less serious and less important than running the business.

Creating effective change in a business begins by treating change as a serious endeavor, not the red-headed stepchild of business. This cannot be accomplished with a once or twice yearly discussion between rounds of golf; it requires sustained, serious attention. If run the business receives a monthly forum in the executive conference room with the CEO, then the change forum requires the same. The entire employee base, from top to bottom, will arrange its attitude toward change from the message the executive team sends about it. .

When conducting a change forum, priorities involved with running the business should be a consideration. For example, if a major new client has just been signed, but delivery times are a critical, a change initiative to revamp the delivery process might be pushed off a few months in favor of something less likely to disrupt a new contract. This should not be considered to be a dismissal of change needs. What is happening in this instance is change in scheduling to accommodate a highly profitable situation. The reverse situation should be handled with equal regard for change needs. If a major change initiative is about to take place, the managers in charge of running the business should try to minimize decisions that will disrupt that process.

Change management and running the business address to very different need areas and separate forums allows them to deal with those needs effectively. It gives the managers involved the chance to focus on their primary concerns, rather than vying for time and attention. It creates an situation in which the administration of change and the running of business are not a constant battle. Lastly, it shows that both running the business and Business Change Management represent have genuine value at the executive level..

For more information, please see our website: Business Change Management

Share This